Is the Supreme Court of India reliable?

An Overview of the Supreme Court of India

Before diving into the reliability of the Supreme Court of India, it is essential to understand its role and functioning. Established in 1950, the Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and the final court of appeal under the Constitution of India. It consists of the Chief Justice of India and 33 other judges, who are appointed by the President of India. The primary function of the court is to ensure the protection of the fundamental rights of citizens and to settle disputes between various governments in the country.
As the guardian of the Constitution, the Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in upholding the rule of law and delivering justice. In this article, we will explore the reliability of the Supreme Court of India by examining various aspects of its functioning, performance, and credibility.

Independence and Impartiality

One of the critical factors contributing to the reliability of any court system is its independence from external influences and its impartiality in rendering judgments. The Indian Constitution has several provisions to ensure the independence and impartiality of the Supreme Court, such as the process of appointment, security of tenure, and immunity from criticism.
However, the appointment process has been a subject of debate and controversy, with allegations of executive interference and nepotism. Despite these concerns, the court has largely managed to maintain its independence and impartiality, resulting in several landmark judgments that have strengthened the democratic fabric of the country.

Transparency and Accountability

For a court to be reliable, it must be transparent in its functioning and accountable for its decisions. The Supreme Court of India has made efforts to improve transparency by making judgments and court proceedings accessible to the public. The introduction of live streaming of court proceedings and the digitization of court records are positive steps towards ensuring transparency.
However, concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in the appointment of judges and the collegium system. The court's accountability has also been questioned, with instances of judges being accused of misconduct and facing impeachment proceedings. While these issues need to be addressed, the overall transparency and accountability of the court remain relatively strong.

Efficiency and Timeliness

A reliable court system must be efficient in its functioning and deliver timely justice. The Supreme Court of India has been grappling with a massive backlog of cases, leading to long delays in justice delivery. Overburdened with cases, the court struggles to dispose of them in a timely manner, causing substantial distress to litigants.
To address this issue, the court has introduced various measures such as increasing the number of judges, adopting technology, and promoting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. While these efforts have shown some improvement, much work remains to be done to enhance the efficiency and timeliness of the court.

Quality of Judgments

The reliability of a court also depends on the quality of its judgments, which should be well-reasoned, based on sound legal principles, and consistent with precedent. The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have shaped the country's legal landscape and expanded the scope of fundamental rights.
However, there have been instances where the court's judgments have been criticized for being inconsistent, arbitrary, or influenced by personal biases. While such instances are relatively rare, they do raise concerns about the quality of judgments and the need to ensure rigorous scrutiny and adherence to legal principles.

Judicial Activism and Overreach

Judicial activism refers to the proactive role played by the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution and laws to address social and political issues. While judicial activism can be seen as a positive force for social change, it may also lead to concerns about the courts overstepping their constitutional mandate and encroaching upon the powers of the executive and legislature.
The Supreme Court of India has been accused of judicial overreach in some instances, leading to a debate on the appropriate balance between activism and restraint. While the court's activism has led to progressive outcomes in some cases, striking the right balance is crucial to maintain the separation of powers and ensure the reliability of the judiciary.

Public Trust and Confidence

Lastly, for a court to be reliable, it must enjoy the trust and confidence of the public it serves. Despite the various challenges and shortcomings, the Supreme Court of India continues to command a high degree of public trust and respect. Many citizens view the court as a bulwark against the erosion of democratic values and the last resort for justice.
However, maintaining and enhancing this trust requires continuous efforts to address the issues of transparency, accountability, efficiency, and quality of judgments. Only by addressing these concerns can the Supreme Court of India continue to be a reliable institution that upholds the rule of law and delivers justice to all.

Write a comment